Court Finally Catches Up With Flippant Mother

The mothers arrogance, abuse of the courts, and mental instability is not particularly unusual for family court observers. What is amazing is the at least 6 admitted partners willing to live/breed with this women knowing the Daddy Drama she’s into.

On top of this, it is a “Do Not Site” case…… Just look at how difficult it is for fathers to fight this biased system of ours. This is typical and most fathers do not win cases like this. Perhaps a change for the better? Time will tell.

In it the mother had 3 children by two fathers, then moved from Kent to Ellensburg, the fathers followed, sharing a house and stayed in daily contact with their kids.

Mom decides to move to Virginia, gives inadequate notice, the fathers file motions to object, get ex parte orders, Mom files Orders of Protection and restraining orders against the dads (prohibiting contact with the kids) out of retaliation and moves to Virginia anyway. The court orders a return, she does. Then back and forth motions and accusations.

GAL finds for the fathers along with school teachers, the court orders mom to enroll the kids in the local school, she does but doesn’t let them go to school saying: “she was simply ordered to enroll the children in the school district, not make them attend school.”

Lots of parental alienation:

The GAL was troubled that the daughter was leaving messages for Mr. Johnson urging him to stop “hurting mommy.”

Mom told the kids that the second father was “not needed any more.”

The Court states: “However, we are most troubled by Ms. Smith’s attempts to turn the children against the fathers.” “the children were afraid at the father’s house because their mother told them someone had committed suicide in the basement.”

Ms. Smith testified that she had recently broken up with a man who had lived in their home and been involved in the children’s lives for two years. At the time of trial she was seeing another man and discussing marriage.

Ms. Smith then moved the children to Seattle without obtaining court approval to live with another new boyfriend, explaining that she believed she had only been forbidden to move to Virginia. Further stating: “It is my right to move away from the small town”

Finally the Court states: “We conclude that all of Ms. Smith’s contentions lack merit.” and ordered the children to reside in their fathers’ house, gave the fathers sole decision-making authority, limited Ms. Smith’s contact with the children to 8 hours every other week of supervised visitation, and ordered Ms. Smith to undergo a psychological evaluation.

Good case law discussion about substantial compliance with notice requirements.

The mothers arrogance, abuse of the courts, and mental instability is not particularly unusual for family court observers. What is amazing is the at least 6 admitted partners willing to live/breed with this women knowing the Daddy Drama she’s into.

BTW for all of you into e-dating, I noticed that in a lot of dating ads, the women are promising no “Daddy Drama” over their kids. Maybe a few men are wising up with the increased visibility of men in family court. Good to see the issue of “Daddy Drama” affecting future partnerships as it should. Perhaps women are starting to see the future consequences to current conflict.

Bang the drum, Fight for your God-given right to raise your kids, Come to Washingto DC on August 15-16 and make a difference. We are everywhere and we are uniting. The govenment seems all to willing to intrude into the family when its not necessary but where are the courts when they are obviousley needed? We are organizing a major event at the Capital Mall. Here’s the “official” video invitation.